All Nonfiction
- Bullying
- Books
- Academic
- Author Interviews
- Celebrity interviews
- College Articles
- College Essays
- Educator of the Year
- Heroes
- Interviews
- Memoir
- Personal Experience
- Sports
- Travel & Culture
All Opinions
- Bullying
- Current Events / Politics
- Discrimination
- Drugs / Alcohol / Smoking
- Entertainment / Celebrities
- Environment
- Love / Relationships
- Movies / Music / TV
- Pop Culture / Trends
- School / College
- Social Issues / Civics
- Spirituality / Religion
- Sports / Hobbies
All Hot Topics
- Bullying
- Community Service
- Environment
- Health
- Letters to the Editor
- Pride & Prejudice
- What Matters
- Back
Summer Guide
- Program Links
- Program Reviews
- Back
College Guide
- College Links
- College Reviews
- College Essays
- College Articles
- Back
i <3 kool shorthand MAG
“I <3 Kool Shorthand” in theOctober issue made a broad generalization about the worth of internetabbreviations and emoticons. I don’t believe that shorthand iscompletely pointless - when used in moderation, it saves time, conveysemotions and adds diversity to converting speech into typed words. Ioften use “LOL” and “OMG” when someone sends mesomething funny or shocking.
Chatting online through instantmessenger or email is designed to be just like speaking out loud, exceptyou can’t hear or see each other. So “LOL” is theequivalent of laughter (as is “haha”) while“OMG” is like an amazed gasp. However, excessive use ofmade-up acronyms and faces does get obnoxious.
I applaud Ishaqfor pointing out that this is unnecessary and irritating but pleasedon’t completely dismiss internet shorthand. It’s adistinctive facet of online communication and watching it evolve can befascinating.
Similar Articles
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
This article has 0 comments.